Isabel Evans
Member for
10 years 2 monthsIsabel is a Fellow of the British Computer Society. She received the 2017 Testing Excellence Award, at the EuroSTAR conference, Copenhagen November 2017. She is honoured to have been the Programme Chair for the EuroSTAR Conference 2019, in Prague. She graduated with a PhD from University of Malta in 2026. Her research is about the experiences of software testers, including examination of stereotyping, common challenges with test tools, and heuristics to improve the design of test tools.
Isabel is a Fellow of the British Computer Society. She received the 2017 Testing Excellence Award, at the EuroSTAR conference, Copenhagen November 2017. She is honoured to have been the Programme Chair for the EuroSTAR Conference 2019, in Prague. She graduated with a PhD from University of Malta in 2026. Her research is about the experiences of software testers, including examination of stereotyping, common challenges with test tools, and heuristics to improve the design of test tools.
All Articles by Isabel Evans
All Stories by Isabel Evans
|
Arts, Crafts, and Critical Thinking: Redefining the Software Tester Persona Testers are not stereotypical IT people, and those differences benefit your teams, organisations and society. While software engineering graduates make useful testers, you will reap benefits from also including artists, social scientists, scientists, crafts people and domain experts from many disciplines as testers, SDETs, and quality engineers in your teams. |
|
Test Tools, Shelfware, and the Illusion of Usability Superficial software usability can mask long-term operational failures in tools to support testing (TsST). Backed by empirical research, this analysis exposes the "illusion of usability" —where tools look marketable but lack the vital operability, learnability, and portability needed to prevent them from becoming expensive, abandoned shelfware. |
|
The Lived Experience of Testers with Their Tools (and Why It Matters) Empirical research reveals that software testing tools profoundly impact practitioners' emotional well-being and professional identity. Beyond technical or usability hurdles, poorly implemented automation triggers negative emotional responses and demotivation. Organizations must consider the totality of "Testers' Lived Experience" (TX) to prevent project failure and role erosion. |
|
Just a Tester? A Report Part-Way Through Data Analysis Testers come from a wider range of backgrounds, and have complex multifaceted roles. People who test are not “just testers…” At present, many testers do not feel well-supported by their tools. As my research uncovered stories of frustration, fear, and anger, I realized the illusory role of usability in tool adoption and the importance of understanding who is using those tools. |