Test Design

This article is a continuation of a previous write-up on "What to Test When It's Not Your Code." As mentioned previously, test strategies should be radically different and flexible when it comes to testing code delivered by any vendor external to an organization. Similarly, the rationale behind deciding what does not need to be tested or what is given the lowest testing priority for external software products should be radically different from the rationale practiced for in-house software products. The reason for the differences has a lot to do with the risk posed by the third-party application on the daily operations of the organization. Also, the credibility of the vendors can play a major role when deciding what takes a lower priority in testing.

In a previous article published on this site, "Testing the Bold and the Beautiful" (May 2001), the author received many thoughtful comments and questions about the importance of aesthetics in software. This paper was inspired in part from those questions. It clarifies the difference between aesthetic testing and usability testing. The paper makes the business case for "beauty testing" and argues that an ugly UI can undermine the bottom line. It offers methods and a survey-template for successful aesthetic testing. The paper concludes with a list of "Facts and Myths, Dos and Don'ts."

Object orientation, the least talked about component of test automation, might be the most important factor. In this column, Dion Johnson explains how effective test automation is heavily reliant on objects.

Big projects require many little user stories. But if these scenarios don't add up to one good story, then you're probably missing out on the big picture. In this week's column, Jeff Patton describes how his team weaves many small tales into a single strong report by identifying key characters and themes.