People Should Think and Machines Should Test

[magazine]

January 29, 2016

Volume-Issue:

2016-01

Article Summary:

Testers often develop programmatic tests that mimic manual test conditions. Harry Robinson and Doug Szabo use real programming examples to show how the computer can provide better test coverage than the test author conceived.

Upcoming Events

Oct 02	STARWEST Software Testing Conference in Anaheim & Online
Nov 06	Agile + DevOps East The Conference for Agile and DevOps Professionals
Apr 30	STAREAST Software Testing Conference in Orlando & Online
Jun 04	Agile + DevOps West The Latest in Agile and DevOps

Recommended Web Seminars

On Demand	How to Drive High-Velocity Mobile Testing With Real & Virtual Devices
Aug 18	How to Improve Your Chatbot with Test Automation
Aug 25	From Spreadsheets to Scalable, Streamlined Test Management
Sep 08	5 Pandemic-Inspired Lessons That Can Improve Your App Quality Today
On Demand	Building Confidence in Your Automation

See All

Featured Resources

Introducing DevOps into Your Project eGuide | TechWell

Enable Continuous CX Improvements with Automated Contact Center Testing | Cyara

Introduction to Containers eGuide | TechWell

2022 Test Coverage Guide | Perforce

Cutting Through The Noise: End The Battle Between Security and Development | Wabbi

Visit Our Other Communities

Bringing you today’s best agile ideas and thought-leaders with how-to advice on the latest agile development & methodology practices.

Where configuration management and development professionals go for answers on SCM, ALM, change management, DevOps, tools and more.