TrainingConferencesAbout UsContact UsAdvertiseSQE.comRSS Feed

StickyMinds.com: brain food for building better software

Log In
 Clarify Your Search Criteria

Tips on Using Our Search Feature(s)
 
StickyMinds.com Home
ResourcesTopicsCommunityPowerPassBlogs
Home  >  Detail: Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There!



A StickyMinds.com Original
Article Picture
Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There!

By Don Gray

Send This Content to a FriendGet a Short Link to This ContentPrint This ContentSee User Comments About This Content

Summary: Maybe you're the kind of person who attacks a problem as soon as it crops up. Many times, it's good to act fast. But for a different point of view, read this week's column by Don Gray, who advises us to "take ten" and evaluate a situation before making a response.


HP
I remember when I first started solving problems for a living. I would leap down the stairs three at a time, race to the computer room, and stare at the line printer (yes, it was that long ago) trying to determine what had happened, and what to do about it. I couldn’t possibly slow down. I had to "Just Do It!" They were depending on me. Of course, by the time I was notified, the problem had already happened, and there wasn’t anything I could do to turn back the hands of time. So eventually, I went down the stairs one at a time, walked to the computer, and was calm and composed when I started investigating the problem.

Now that I spend time working with people, the habit of "Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There" serves me well. But for me, "standing there" is an active event. I use this time to determine what is happening, how it is happening, and the best course of action before diving in. To help me with this effort, I use the following techniques:

Gather Some Information
The first activity is gathering information. Asking open-ended questions keeps me involved in what’s happening while I’m standing there. Three of my favorite questions are:

  1. How did you (we) come to be here?
  2. How do you feel about it?
  3. What would you like to have happen?

These questions can be answered on many levels. You might hear the history of actions. Maybe you’ll hear about the decisions and personalities involved. Another possible response is a story of emotional highs and lows. The response you get will tell you about the corporate culture. Superficial responses indicate a closed culture that doesn’t tolerate free thinking very well. An open, honest, well-balanced response indicates a safe culture where individuals are encouraged to think and speak freely.

As I gather information, I try to use as many of my senses as possible. As I listen, I watch and see if the body language, facial expressions, and setting agree with the words. Is the information coherent? Do I have enough information, or do I need more? Common problems with information gathering involve getting too little information or getting too much.

Decide What the Information Means
The next activity as I stand there is to figure out what the information I’ve gathered means. It’s probable that the message I’ve received is not exactly the message that was sent. This is because, as Bandler and Grinder said in The Structure of Magic, "there is an irreducible difference between the world and our experience of it. We as human beings do not operate directly on the world. Each of us creates a representation of the world in which we live, that is, we create a map or model which we use to generate our behavior." In other words, there is always some interpretation going on.

To help improve the odds of getting the right message, I like to use Jerry Weinberg’s Rule of Three. The Rule of Three states: "If I can’t think of at least three different interpretations of what I received, I haven’t thought enough about what it might mean." Then of the three, I can select the interpretation that seems to best fit the situation at hand.

For example, in reviewing project progress, I sometimes hear, "I thought you were going to do that." Three possible interpretations (among many others) might be:

  1. It wasn’t clear who was going to do this task.
  2. You’re right, I’m wrong, and I’ll get right on it!
  3. I am a bad person because I didn’t do what you thought I was going to do.

Evaluate the Significance of the Interpretation
This raises the significance question. How do I feel about the interpretation I select? Even though the interaction I’m working on is external, how I approach the matter is influenced by my feelings and world model. Additionally, the significance I associate with the selected interpretation may not have any relationship to the significance assigned by others.

When determining the significance of my interpretation, a wonderful check is "What have I seen or heard that makes me feel this is the best interpretation?" This data question serves as a check on my processing, and allows another view of what I feel is happening.

Now Do Something
After getting information, selecting a meaning for it, and determining its significance, I’m ready to make a response. I’ve found that following these steps keeps me from jumping the gun and doing things before I’ve fully processed the situation.

How long should this "standing there" take? The quick answer is "It all depends." In actual practice, it doesn’t take long. And the time spent is redeemed by the increased effectiveness of my work. My mother was right. She always told me, "Before you do something in haste, you should count to ten." Now you know what I do while I’m counting!



About the Author
For more than twenty years, Don Gray has worked in applied cybernetics, starting in machine and process automation and migrating to organizational systems and changes. His major areas of interest are cognition, modeling, and understanding system change. He is a Principal at nth Order Systems where he works on integrating people, projects, and processes. He is also an AYE Host. Don has published several articles, including "Managing in Mayberry," "Solving Other People's Problems," and "Doing the Measurement Mambo." Don says that if he were to write a book, the title would be something like The View from an Alternate Reality. For fun and "stretching," Don is immersed in whitewater kayaking. He is an American Canoe Association Certified Whitewater Kayak Instructor and Advanced Swiftwater Rescue Instructor. And now he is the proud grandparent of Jessica Kathryn King!

Back to Top
 

StickyMinds.com Weekly Column From 9/16/02 

Member Comments
Add Your Comment
 
Comment:    
by don gray 9/19/2002

I didn't consider "bad person" as being sarcastic. These are responses that happen within me, and as such are aren't open to interpretation by others, until I share which interpretation I chose. Some days I'm the windshield, some days I'm the bug. After a few days of being the "bug", my self esteem may get low, and that's when I'm more prone to the "bad person" response. I'm glad you kept an open mind about deciding how to interpret my choice of words.

 
 
Comment:    
by George Wilkinson 9/18/2002

In this day and age where people and systems are becoming more demanding it has almost become an in-built modern reflex to act immediately on response to something. This is a nice reminder that we are all human and to have our own ‘world model'. Therefore we can interpret information quite differently from each other and therefore act wrongly. The article was good, but I felt that ‘being a bad person’ could be seen as being sarcastic if it were actually said to someone, rather than purely being interpreted. This could have been pointed out to the reader.

 
 
Comment:    
by Rose Swain 9/18/2002

A good article bringing to the forefront a point that is often missed. When we jump the gun, even with good intentions, the achieved result is not always the desired result. An example is finding bugs in production systems and jumping in to write some code to fix the problem without fully thinking through the problem, its cause from upstream, and what is affected downstream. What usually happens is that more problems are created by the 'fix'. If we could all just stand there a minute, ask the right questions and think all the way to the end of the stream, imagine what would happen.

 
 
Comment:    
by Richard Whitehead 9/17/2002

Excellent advice. But it is important to be an active listener, and make clear to the people around that you are taking the problem seriously. If the users (or whoever is affected by the problem) get the impression that you don't care about the problem, there will be repercussions, even if they were actually mistaken.

 
 
Comment:    
by Erik Petersen 9/16/2002

One of the simplest uses of this advice is in responding to emails. Think about the message first, and possible interpretations. Don't presume that your misinterpretation of an ambiguous message is the correct one and start a flame war. If you are not sure, write your email and put it aside for a little while then read it from the other person's point of view. Better still (or if you are still uncertain), ring or talk to the person and get immediate feedback.....

 
Back to Top



 
Ads By Google
What's This?
 
 



Home   |   Resources   |   Topics   |   Community   |   PowerPass



© 2010 StickyMinds.com. All rights reserved.
StickyMinds.com is a division of Software Quality Engineering.
Privacy Policy    Terms & Conditions    Link to StickyMinds.com    Feedback


Seapine




Agile Development Practices 

STARWEST