TrainingConferencesAbout UsContact UsAdvertiseSQE.comRSS Feed

StickyMinds.com: brain food for building better software

Log In
 Clarify Your Search Criteria

Tips on Using Our Search Feature(s)
 
StickyMinds.com Home
ResourcesTopicsCommunityPowerPassBlogs
Home  >  Detail: Addicted to Adrenaline



A StickyMinds.com Original
Article Picture
Addicted to Adrenaline

By Linda Hayes

Send This Content to a FriendGet a Short Link to This ContentPrint This ContentSee User Comments About This Content

Summary: Are you a manager who lavishes praise on those who can swoop in and save the day when a project hits the skids? Are you an employee who prides yourself on damage control and the ability to pull all-nighters? If so, industry expert Linda Hayes suggests that you or your organization may have a condition that masks an even more troubling underlying problem.


HP
We've all been there. Whether it's the night before the big deadline or the night after the big crash, we have all soldiered on through crazy hours, working frantically to achieve the impossible. And, exhausted but triumphant, we have all achieved the impossible more times than seems possible. 
 
But is this a good thing? 
 
This question stopped me short in a recent meeting where we discussed the chances of management approval for a test automation initiative. I was waxing enthusiastic about the benefits of reducing the cost of operating failures through increased coverage, and I asked the test manager whether she thought this idea would resonate with management. She reflected, then said, "I’m not sure they appreciate the risks because we have been so successful in averting or recovering from them." 
 
In fact, she continued, the organization had become so expert at responding effectively to crises that they had all but developed an addiction to the adrenaline that flowed from the high drama of high stakes. After all, how boring is the predictability that comes from developing and following thorough and well-thought-out plans? Or, even more insidious, how much more gratifying is it to be perceived as a hero who has overcome all odds to save the day, rather than as a solid, consistent performer?  
 
Ironically, the very skill of dealing with disasters masks the underlying need for it—the lack of planning and process—thereby discouraging management commitment to solving the real problem.  
 
Does your organization have this problem? And, if it does, how do you solve it? 
 
The Symptoms 
One symptom of adrenaline addiction is the ubiquitous use of pagers. Now, I realize that pagers are useful ways of communicating in companies that are widespread, but what I'm talking about are companies where pagers are used constantly because the crisis du jour can't wait until you are back at your desk to get a voice mail. While every company has emergencies now and then, when they become common occurrences you know you have a problem. 
 
I once consulted for a company where pager calls were so common that to get anyone’s attention you had to put "911" in the message, and when that became overused it was "*911*" which meant, I suppose, this is REALLY a REAL emergency, as opposed to the usual emergency. It was both comic and tragic. People brandished their pagers like pistols, whipping them out of their holsters, frowning ominously, then announcing importantly that they were needed at once elsewhere. Meetings could barely be convened let alone concluded without one or another attendee having to scurry off, fire hose at the ready. Unfortunately, the story had an unhappy ending—the company did not survive. 
 
Other symptoms include, of course, constant overtime leading to employee burnout and turnover, employee burnout causing overall deterioration of morale, deterioration of morale resulting in declining productivity and falling profits, etc. 
 
Adrenaline in small doses readies us for fight or flight; a steady diet dulls our senses. 
 
The Cure 
So what can you do about it? Obviously, it is not healthy for your career to ignore true emergencies for the sake of making a point, as in those signs that say "Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part," even though it might be justified. On the other hand, you might unwittingly be reinforcing adrenaline addiction if you only notice and reward crisis-response behaviors and ignore those who maintain sane schedules precisely because they have not precipitated any problems. 
 
I am reminded of my first real job out of college at an accounting firm, where I sought to impress the partners by arriving early, staying late, and generally maintaining a harried air. The managing partner called me into his office and told me that they had noticed the hours I was keeping. I was preparing to accept his appreciation and perhaps a raise or promotion, when instead he informed me that they had scheduled me for a time management course! Exhausted accountants make more mistakes, he said, that have to be caught and corrected by others. It was far more efficient, in his experience, to be rested and alert. A wise man. 
 
So take this quiz:  
 
If you are an employee, are you 1) drawing attention only to extreme measures, or are you 2) taking pride in the calm, efficient discharge of your responsibilities? 
 
If you are a manager or team leader, are you 1) showering praise on those whose inefficiencies result in all-nighters, or are you 2) measuring and rewarding those who are so well organized that they don’t generate any drama? And, once a crisis has passed, are you 1) so grateful for the heroic measures that you fail to question the reason for the threat in the first place, or do you 2) conduct a postmortem to focus on how the entire episode could have been prevented?  
 
If you answered any of these questions with a "1," you are an adrenaline addict. Seek help.


About the Author
Linda Hayes is the founder of three software companies including AutoTester in 1986, which delivered the first automated testing program for the IBM PC. Linda has pioneered automated test tools. Her new company, Worksoft, offers Certify, which represents the next generation of enterprise-level test automation. Worksoft also offers a free online newsletter called "Reality Check," which provides links to articles, white papers, and other compelling information on testing. A frequent industry speaker and award winning author, she publishes the monthly Quality Quest column for Datamation, wrote the Automated Testing Handbook, and co-edited Dare to be Excellent with Alka Jarvis on best practices in the software industry. You can contact Linda at Linda@worksoft.com.

Back to Top
 

StickyMinds.com Weekly Column From 11/12/01 

Member Comments
Add Your CommentExpand Comments
 
Comment:    
by Gene Fellner 3/26/2003

The long-term effects of overtime and overwork are well documented, if not well publicized. One would almost think it was a nationwide secret of sacramental proportions. The average American work week has stretched from the post-WWII standard of 40 hours, almost back to the 50 hour standard at the turn of the previous century. Ironically, the computer revolution, which was supposed to make life easier, is largely responsible for this, especially within the IT industry itself. For more on this, see my chapter entitled "Unreported and Unpaid Overtime: Distorted Metrics and Formulas for Failure" in the book "IT Measurement: Practical Advice...Read On

 
 
Comment:    
by Larry Meadows 7/3/2002

Hi Folks, The address for Adrenaline Addicts Anonymous is: http://pw1.netcom.com/~periwink/adrenanon.html You may email us at adrenaline@coolsite.net Thanks, Adrenaline

 
 
Comment:    
by Jim Bodie 11/16/2001

Right on! And I can look back on my career and say that I fall in the '2' group. Our efforts were always directed towards avoiding overtime; all "heroic" efforts resulted in reviews to determine how it could be prevented from happening again.

 
 
Comment:    
by Danny Faught 11/15/2001

This is a problem that crops up in many areas. When you do effective risk management, you're not praised for averting disaster, you're asked to justify why you spend so much on risk mitigation when there don't seem to be any problems to worry about. For example, I was dumbfounded by an editorial that was published on January 2, 2000. It questioned why we had spent so much fixing the "so-called" Y2K problem - after all, society survived Y2K without a major problem. Just consider what would have happened if we hadn't invested in mitigation, though! Ron raises a good point, and makes me consider that you can't have good without bad. So if...Read On

 
 
Comment:    
by Batchu Venkataraman 11/15/2001

The problem has been address in a different way in our organisation. The team of testers has been divided in to 2 parts - with one bunch of tester coming in at 8 am and the 2nd batch of testers would come-in in the afternoon and leave at 11 pm. This has been done to sync with our overseas offices and to release patches that come in "late".

 
 
Comment:    
by swarnalatha ganapathy 11/15/2001

Yeah What you had said is true about Adrenalien addiction which is more profound in this IT industry.It is scientifically(medically) proved that the productivity of people who work for more than the scheduled time is less compared to people who are time consious.

 
 
Comment:    
by Ron Steele 11/15/2001

Although the article makes perfect sense, the other side of the issue is that the SQA testing that I've done can be boring and montonous work. There is no excuse for not using the 5P principle (Proper Planning Prevents Poor Performance) when developing software, but then not everything can be planned. It's not bullets whizzing by, but when something new, urgent & important is happening, and I pull a 60+ hour week, I definitely know that I've earned my money, and so does the company. And the whole development group looks good because of it too - That's not a bad thing. It's no way to run a project, but occasionally, a little bit of...Read On

 
 
Comment:    
by Sidney Snook 11/14/2001

As a Navy Vietnam Veteran I have experienced first-hand Adrenaline Addiction of the first order...bullets flying by my head, night aircarft carrier landings, driving a 14,000 ton steel ship alongside another larger ship within 10 yards or less for underway replenishment with 20+ foot waves... When I got out of the military (~30 years ago) I have to admit that I experienced...and often sought out...this same feeling under the work conditions you have described in your article...and it was again adictive. Fortunately as I have matured in years I have realized that I cannot sustain this kind of practice nor is this kind of practice truely...Read On

 
 
Comment:    
by Christian Hansen 11/14/2001

I agree totally with your article. In my company, many developers pull all-nighters and generally adhere to the cold pizza/warm Coca-Cola diet. I ensure that my test analysts plan their time, keep regular hours, and only stay late or come in over the weekend when necessary. I have happy productive test analysts who are able to keep up with all the work they need to do, while the developers often have difficulty delivering on time. I also have found that only requiring overtime when absolutely necessary makes people happier to perform it when it is genuinely necessary. Requiring constant overtime overtly or covertly makes resentful, unhappy...Read On

 
 
Comment:    
by Jaiprakash Gurala 11/13/2001

I totally agree with the author. Organizations should nurture the culture of planning and risk management. Sometimes I find few are organized and others are not. Things are taken lightly, in the sense, may be a task is almost at the end of the project, but it requires inputs from the initial stages of the project. Hence all should visualize the problems that may occur and prevent the same. Otherwise as it is stated in the article always there will be fire fighting. Planning and visualization has to be cultivated across the organization.

 
 
Comment:    
by abrachan pudussery 11/12/2001

I fully agree with you. But not many understands it. Crosby advocates prevention as the system for quality. But then just talking in the thin air will not work. We need principle centered management, who can walk the talk.

 
 
Comment:    
by yogita sahoo 11/12/2001

We have to accept the fact that the number of adrenaline addicts in s/w is much higher than those in any other industry. Having moved straight from a hotel job to testing, I was taken by surprise to see my colleagues (in the later job) with red eyes and messy hair many times , when I entered office. I still consider the hotel industry to be tougher than s/w. But there, people (and the managers) believed in output and not the amount of time you put into your job. Fortunately, my manager believed that people who stay late to finish their work are inefficient and less productive compared to those who leave on time. I believe, the manager's...Read On

 
Back to Top



 
Ads By Google
What's This?
 
 



Home   |   Resources   |   Topics   |   Community   |   PowerPass



© 2010 StickyMinds.com. All rights reserved.
StickyMinds.com is a division of Software Quality Engineering.
Privacy Policy    Terms & Conditions    Link to StickyMinds.com    Feedback


Cloud Connection

Rally Software




STAREAST 


Better Software Conference