TrainingConferencesAbout UsContact UsAdvertiseSQE.comRSS Feed

StickyMinds.com: brain food for building better software

Log In
 Clarify Your Search Criteria

Tips on Using Our Search Feature(s)
 
StickyMinds.com Home
ResourcesTopicsCommunityPowerPassBlogs
Home  >  Detail: Opening the Door to Better Open Door Policies



A StickyMinds.com Original
Article Picture
Opening the Door to Better Open Door Policies

By Naomi Karten

Send This Content to a FriendGet a Short Link to This ContentPrint This ContentSee User Comments About This Content

Summary: Many managers claim to have an open-door policy. These managers mean well; they want to be available to their employees. But do they really have an open-door policy, or is that a handy name for a commendable intention? In this week's column, Naomi Karten describes the flaws she has observed in open-door policies and offers suggestions for making them work.


ThoughtWorks
Hear more about good and bad open door policies in the StickyMinds SoundByte podcast interview with Naomi Karten.

Andy, the director of a software department I was visiting, told me proudly during our first meeting, "I have an open-door policy. My staff can come and talk to me any time."

When employees can easily gain access to their managers and count on getting a fair hearing, the entire organization benefits from a culture of trust, open communication, and respect. Furthermore, these accessible managers tend to have employees who are forthcoming both in offering ideas and disclosing problems. But in working with Andy's team and other groups subsequently, I saw that there’s sometimes a contradiction between the purported open-door policy and what these managers actually do.

For example:

  • Some managers claim to have an open-door policy, and, indeed, their doors are wide open. But glimpse inside when you pass by and you'll see that they're rarely there. Invariably, there’s another meeting, another appointment, another problem that seems to have a higher priority than being available to their staff. These managers want to do right by their employees--as soon as they finish taking care of everything else on their to-do lists.
  • Some managers who profess to have an open door policy are available when employees drop in. Unfortunately, their simultaneous availability to their phone, email, and people poking their head in with "just a quick question" suggests that the door is a little too open. For these managers, no matter is trivial enough to ignore, dismiss, or postpone. I observed one such meeting in amazement as the manager repeatedly interrupted a discussion with two of his employees to tend to one thing and another, seemingly oblivious to the disrespect he was showing them.
  • Some managers apparently interpret "open door policy" to mean simply that an employee can enter at any time. But when an employee comes by with a problem, concern, or idea, these managers arbitrarily dismiss it. Their employees are quick learners; they quickly learn not to even bother. For example, Dean, a project manager, had an excellent idea for addressing some snags the team was facing. When I asked why he didn't present them to Tom, his manager, he grumbled that there was no point since Tom immediately shoots down ideas that aren't his own. Dean's teammates reported similar experiences.
  • Some managers demand that their employees, as one manager put it, "are prepared to propose a solution when they come to me with a problem." In other words, the door is wide open, but don't you dare step through that doorway to report a problem if you can't recommend a solution. I commend these managers for striving to create a staff of independent problem solvers. Unfortunately, these good intentions sometimes discourage employees from seeking help with pressing problems that they don't know how to resolve. Such problems, if left untreated, often pave the way to crises.
And then there was Andy, the software director I visited. Senior management had directed him to convert his department into a profit center. Rather than tackling only projects that clients requested, as had been the case for several years, the department would now have to proactively seek projects from clients and sell the value of the group's services. This was a significantly different business model for the department, but Andy was fortunate; his staff, a very bright bunch, overflowed with ideas about how to carry out this transition. And as Andy had told me, his door was open.

But Andy's passive approach to seeking input exemplified yet another potential flaw in open-door policies. Andy didn't seek out his employees and invite their input; instead, he waited until they came to him. Many of Andy's staff members weren't reluctant to speak their minds to anyone, anywhere, and at any time. Others, however, held back--not because of a lack of ideas, but rather due to a reluctance to present them to him.

This reluctance is not an isolated situation. For many employees, the very notion of proactively approaching their superiors is a gulp-inducing experience. Maybe they lack self-confidence. Maybe they've had past experiences in which their ideas were shot down. Whatever their reasons, these people hold back.

Yet, people who are hesitant to present their ideas sometimes have ideas well worth hearing, as was the case in Andy's department. After one of my visits, Emily, a member of the department, sent me a lengthy email message in which she described her thoughts about transitioning to the new business model. Emily's ideas were astute, articulate, and on target. "But," she wrote in her message, "I haven't presented these ideas to Andy for the simple reason that he has never asked."

Clearly, she should have taken the initiative. But that's just the point--she should have, but she didn't, and she wouldn't. And she is just one of many people who refrain from presenting their ideas to management because, for one reason or another, they are not comfortable initiating the dialogue. Instead, they wait for an explicit invitation.

Rather than merely claiming to have an open door policy, managers who truly want to hear from their employees should consider proactive measures. For example, they might occasionally exit their office, not just to race to the next meeting, but to go out to employees to see what's on their minds. Managers can also establish fixed office hours for employees, schedule periodic one-on-ones with them, and follow up with them regarding issues raised during their conversations. And when an employee comes through their open doorway with a valid concern, they should focus their attention exclusively on that individual.

In fact, sometimes shutting the door to prevent interruptions and distractions is the best way to implement an open door policy.


About the Author
Naomi Karten (www.nkarten.com) is the author of numerous books and eBooks, including Changing How You Communicate During Change and How to Survive, Excel and Advance as an Introvert, as well as her informative, chuckle-generating newsletter, Perceptions & Realities. As a highly experienced seminar leader and speaker, she draws from her psychology and IT background to help organizations improve customer satisfaction, manage customer expectations, and strengthen teamwork. She has delivered seminars and presentations to more than 100,000 people throughout the US and numerous other countries. She would enjoy hearing from you at naomikarten@verizon.net.

Back to Top
 

StickyMinds.com Weekly Column From 4/7/2008 

Member Comments
Add Your CommentExpand Comments
 
Comment:    
by Surya Pratap 4/11/2008

Thats so true. Open-Door policy has to be implemented with the same type of mind-set. Just opening a door does not make it an open-door policy. Could not agree more.

Author's Response:
4/11/2008    
Surya, how right you are: “Just opening a door does not make it an open-door policy.” It’s not the physical door or the opening through the doorway that makes it an open-door policy, it’s how managers actually treat their employees that determine whether or not it’s a true open-door policy. – Naomi

 
 
Comment:    
by Mohamed Sirajudeen Coimbatore Sala, 4/11/2008

Thanks for the article, Naomi!!! In Indian context, 'Open Door Policy' requires a major shift in mindset of the employees. My previous employer followed the policy in letter and spirit, but unfortunately the policy failed because of the 'mental block'(my superiors are unapprochable) and 'fear factor'(he/she might shoot down my ideas) set in the employees. Finally, the Director of Delivery had to 'invite' the software engineers for a discussion to understand the issues in the projects/process.

Author's Response:
4/11/2008    
Mohamed, thanks for aptly pointing out that both the letter of the policy and the spirit of the policy are irrelevant without an appropriate mindset. If superiors are unapproachable (which may be more prevalent in certain parts of the world than others, but which can occur anywhere), the policy won’t work. And if people fear their superiors or are concerned that their ideas won’t receive a fair hearing, the policy won’t work. -- Naomi

 
 
Comment:    
by Srinivasan Desikan 4/11/2008

"Open Door" is not reality for any manager but should be a serious intent. So we have to find time. When there is a serious intent, time never comes as a constraint. I have a policy to listen to people, whoever comes in for 2 minutes. In that 2 minutes together we decide whether we will continue the discussion or setup a diff meeting. 60% of issues get resolved in 2 minutes itself (majority not serious enough or for someone else to handle), 20% of issues get continued for another 10-15 minutes and only 20% of them really require appointment to be setup later. Try to walk along with people (who come to you) in corridor, to parking place, to...Read On

Author's Response:
4/11/2008    
Thanks, Srinivasan, I really like your open door policy. You have formalized it in a way that’s both simple and practical for both the manager and the employees. I want to quote your closing comments to make sure others see it: “You are a good manager only when a team member feels that "You are busy but 100% available for any serious issues". As you indicated, this attitude demonstrates that although you may be busy (and even when you're busy), you really care about the team. – Naomi

 
 
Comment:    
by Bob Edwards 4/10/2008

As a manager, one thing I've found helpful in support of an open door policy is to setup one small rule... which is, just ping me first to see if this is a good time, or if I'm in the middle of something involved. Open-door is a great concept, but its unreasonable for anyone to expect their manager to be available 100% of the time just at the drop of a hat - managers have tasks to complete as well. For a very long time, I've used some form of instant messeging to achive this - whether hosting an ICS, or for the past five or six years, the IM tools that are available. Just a quick "hey boss, do you have a few minutes?" really helps make...Read On

Author's Response:
4/10/2008    
Bob, I really like your Ping rule. Most employees understand that their manager is busy and can’t always drop everything on a moment’s notice -- even when the door is open. A simple ping shows mutual respect. Thanks for suggesting it.

And you are so right about managers who take credit for ideas that come from their employees. Giving credit where credit is due is not just the right thing to do; it motivates employees to give the job their best effort because they know they will be recognized for their contributions. The best managers, in my experience, get satisfaction from touting the accomplishments and efforts of their employees. -- Naomi






 
 
Comment:    
by M George 4/8/2008

Hello. In the past, I've had managers with the "open door" policy but when I poked my head in the door (which was open) and asked if I they had a second, I got a furrowed brow and an annoyed, "Yeah". Perhaps busy managers could help themselves by closing the door if they aren't prepared to have someone walk through it.

Author's Response:
4/8/2008    
Excellent point! This is a good example of the disconnect that sometimes occurs between the policy and what employees experience. There’s nothing wrong with shutting the door to get some work done. Alternatively, managers who prefer to keep their doors open even when they’re really busy might simply say “Give me 10 minutes to finish what I’m working on and I’ll be able to give you my full attention.” That way, they would be treating employees respectfully while not having to drop everything whenever an employee came by. --Naomi

 
 
Comment:    
by Sanat Sharma 4/7/2008

Open Door policies are easy to say but hard to implement. I agree with you, Naomi, that most of the managers are under impression that Open Door policies means that any employee can reach to them at any time. But practically, there are n number of factors due to which these policies remains as decorative as Chinese lamps.

-- Sanat Sharma

Author's Response:
4/7/2008    
Sanat, you are right that there are numerous factors that can affect the effectiveness of these policies. A good starting point for managers who support an open door policy is to reflect on whether their behavior is consistent with the policy. Sometimes, it just takes some minor tweaking to bring the two into sync with each other. --Naomi

 
Back to Top



 
Ads By Google
What's This?
 
 



Home   |   Resources   |   Topics   |   Community   |   PowerPass



© 2010 StickyMinds.com. All rights reserved.
StickyMinds.com is a division of Software Quality Engineering.
Privacy Policy    Terms & Conditions    Link to StickyMinds.com    Feedback


Klocwork

Infosys




STARWEST 

Agile Development Practices