TrainingConferencesAbout UsContact UsAdvertiseSQE.comRSS Feed

StickyMinds.com: brain food for building better software

Log In
 Clarify Your Search Criteria

Tips on Using Our Search Feature(s)
 
StickyMinds.com Home
ResourcesTopicsCommunityPowerPass
Home  >  Detail: Skills are Only Half the Equation for Success



A StickyMinds.com Original
Article Picture
Skills are Only Half the Equation for Success

By Esther Derby

Send This Content to a FriendGet a Short Link to This ContentPrint This ContentSee User Comments About This Content

Summary: Managers work hard to hire the right people for the job. Yet sometimes, the work doesn’t go as well as we think it should. Was it a bad hire? Has the person developed a bad attitude? Maybe, but before you jump to conclusions, look at the other half of the performance equation.


HP SOA
StarWest Speaker Better Software Conference and EXPO 
 
Many years ago, psychologist Kurt Lewin reduced the mysteries of human behavior to this simple statement:  
 
B = ƒ(P,E)  
 
Behavior is a function of the Person and the Environment 
 
Of course, it’s not that simple. But I still find this notation useful, because it reminds me that the skills and abilities of the person aren’t the only factors that contribute performance. 
 
Much of the time, organizations focus on the Person part of the equation. That’s important, because our work requires intelligent people with a wide range of functional skills, technical and domain knowledge, and appropriate interpersonal skills. Most managers work hard to hire the right people. Managers also provide coaching and feedback to help people hone their skills and develop their capabilities. 
 
But that’s only half the equation.  
 
Organizational factors, corporate culture, policies, and the direct work environment influence performance, too. The good news is that you can influence the environment for your group in ways that increase performance. 
 
Are You Creating an Environment for Success? 
Let’s assume that you’ve hired bright, capable people who have the appropriate skills and qualities for the job. They have the technical skills the job demands, they know the domain, and they’re familiar with the product. Yet the work isn’t going as well as you think it should. Maybe it’s the environment, not the person. Look at these areas to see if you can improve the environment for success. 
 
People need to know what the priorities are. Managers don’t (and can’t) make all the decisions about how work is done. Managers need to establish clear priorities so that the people closest to the work can make good decisions. Communicate a clear mission and ensure that each person understands his top-three priorities. People perform better when they understand the mission of the group and what’s most important. 
 
People can’t do their best without the right tools for the job. But hardware and tools, of course, aren’t the only resources people need. They need time, access to expertise, and training. No one I know can manufacture time, but setting clear priorities and keeping the workload reasonable reduce the sense of overwhelming demands. When budgets are tight, find inexpensive ways to feed the need for training and expertise. Offer to buy books for a lunchtime study group and support access to content websites and other free sources of information. 
 
People desire respect. Every once in a while I hear a manager assert that people work best when they’re a little afraid. I don’t buy that. Show respect by keeping promises, communicating openly, and listening to other people’s ideas. Don’t take phone calls and pages or check email during meetings, especially one-on-one meetings.  
 
People want challenging work. Make work assignments based on interests, or better yet, work with your team to have them self-organize. That way, people will have a chance to choose work that appeals to them. Now, every group has some scut work. Rather than assign that to one unfortunate person, rotate responsibility for the work no one really enjoys, but everyone recognizes is necessary. 
 
People want recognition and appreciation. I’m not talking rewards here, monetary or otherwise. Humans crave genuine acknowledgement for their contributions at work—both concrete accomplishments and the intangible ways they contribute to the spirit and success of the group. Let people know that you notice and appreciate them every week. I don’t think saying “thank you” or “good job” is good enough. I like to address the person directly, like this: “Don, I appreciate you for shipping that data update on time. It makes a big difference to our clients.” 
 
Are There Environmental Roadblocks Stifling Performance? 
Suppose you’ve done all of these things (and more) to establish an environment for success. Your work is not done.  
 
Corporate culture and norms are part of the environment and so are policies, procedures, measures, and reward systems. Examine the organizational environment to see if there are other obstacles that keep people from doing their best. 
 
Are there factors that actually punish people for doing a good job? I once worked with a support group that was having a crisis in customer satisfaction. Support agents were expected to meet certain targets for the length of calls.That worked fine with simple problems, but when a tough problem that took more than a minute or two to fix came along, it was a problem. The measure actually punished people who went the extra mile for the customer and stayed on the phone long past the allotted time. These folks had the knowledge and skills to perform, but an environmental factor (a poorly designed measure) was in the way.  
 
Sometimes policies and procedures are the culprit in stifling performance. One organization I know of requires bi-weekly budget reporting and forecasting. It can take up to seven working days to assemble all the bits of information needed to create a report. The procedure is difficult and frustrating, and the time people spend every month on budgets means they aren’t doing other valuable work. In another group, each team member is required to provide written feedback to every other team member every quarter. It wasn’t so bad when there were five team members, but now that there are twenty people in the group… well, you can do the math. 
 
Pile on enough environmental roadblocks and people become frustrated and cynical. And frustrated, cynical people are less likely to do a good job.  
 
Individual managers can’t always change measurement systems, policies, and procedures. Insulate your group where you can and put the rest in context.  
 
Remember that an individual’s skills and abilities aren’t the only factors in performance. Managers need to attend to both the person and the environment when assessing performance. Don’t wait until the next performance evaluation season rolls around. Evaluate the work environment now. Does the management infrastructure enable high performance? Are you working to remove or reduce the obstacles that are hampering performance? What else can you do to create an environment for success?


About the Author
Esther Derby works with project teams and managers to overcome the obstacles they face building software. She also coaches technical people making the transition to management and is one of the founders of the AYE Conference. You can read more of Esther’s musings on the wonderful world of software at www.estherderby.com and on her weblog Her email is derby@estherderby.com.

Back to Top
 
 

Member Comments
Add Your CommentExpand Comments
 
Comment:    
by Balan Swaminathan 8/5/2004

It is an article came to me at the right time through the Sticky letter. The author has dealt with the practical situation in organizations where you have the right skills, but something prevents them to deliver their best. The article deals with the psychological impact of personal and environmental aspects. These ideas and suggestions of the author are really useful for me in the process of restoring my teams ability to deliver the best.

 
 
Comment:    
by Diane Albert 8/4/2004

great article! It gave me pause to remember my yearly review from January - definitely NOT a stellar one. But as I thought about the opening comment my supervisor made ("Not one of your better years"...and i agreed), I realized that I did meet the goals that were laid out, even if the projects associated had failed, usually from outside influences. Yet I am penalized because it appears that there were no successes in the current environment. I also agree about physical environments affecting our skills. The men in our office tend to chide the women when we complain about the cold temperatures - but i've worked while wearing gloves! We...Read On

 
 
Comment:    
by Tek Wallah 6/26/2004

Kurt Lewin’s formula, as correctly stated by Ms Derby, has been superceded by the accounting formula P = f(S,E), which is to say that Profits depend on Sales and Expenses. The challenge to QA is to prove that they are not simply an expense. You will notice that there is no “Q” in either formula. IT personnel are suffering from a malaise of disrespect, pay is falling in most countries, training budgets have been slashed, infrastructure has been allowed to deteriorate. Sadly, we have regressed in almost all the items Ms Derby has listed and which were confirmed by that famous 25-year project from Gallup.

 
 
Comment:    
by Matthew Heusser 6/25/2004

"Support agents were expected to meet certain targets for the length of calls.That worked fine with simple problems, but when a tough problem that took more than a minute or two to fix came along, it was a problem ..." A great example of how human nature tends to abuse and corrupt metrics. Also, about Charles Ayers's Comment: I know they look insane to you. The amazing thing is that, had you been hired into the management group, the culture and environment would probably make those same decisions seem perfectly sane!! Interestingly, I think a great number of the people who are able to see "above" the situation are either (A) External...Read On

 
 
Comment:    
by R. Charles Ayers 6/24/2004

Wow. It's great to have similar perspectives on team managment. I could write a book on my last experience with a major company and their work environment and policies - how it affected performance of teams. Worked in high rise office where the temporature in summer ranged like this: 6am-8am 67 degrees 8am-9am 79 to 80 degrees 9am-5pm 80 to 85 degres 5pm and on back to 67 degrees Then there was a new policy twist placed on IT teams. All projects were behind in schedule and team was already thinned to minimal personnel count. They decided that all departements would exchange weekly status reports via email rather than just in the...Read On

Author's Response:
6/25/2004    
Hi, Charles – Good point! I didn’t mention in the physical environment, which can also effect productivity. Working in physically uncomfortable takes a toll. If the physical set up is ergonomically inappropriate, it can even result in serious health problems. Thanks for writing.

 
 
Comment:    
by Srinivasan Desikan 6/23/2004

The author is right in saying "build the environment right before hiring right person". Esther Derby, brought out a topic which is the most important aspect, in hiring. Thanks a lot!. We shouldn't build a car which works only in one country or only part of the year or only in city roads. Same Cars are expected to work in countryside also. From above example, I would like to redefine what we mean by skill. Skill has two dimensions, hard skill and soft skill. Hardskills are those what are described as technical skills, that we normally look for in interviews. People need to have the soft skills to identify the problems in environment...Read On

Author's Response:
6/25/2004    
Hi, Srinivasan – I absolutely agree! Considering the soft skills required for success are as important as the technical skills. Of course, not every situation needs the same soft skills, it’s important to consider the context – how interdependent the work is, who the job communicates with, the culture of the group and the company. You might be interested in this article about hiring for a collaborative team: http://www.computerworld.com/careertopics/careers/story/0,10801,91817,00.html (also see Johanna Rothman’s forthcoming book on hiring technical people). Thanks for writing.

 
 
Comment:    
by John Daughety 6/23/2004

The reason I believe consultants appear so insightful to their clients is that they assess a situation from a distance and with objectivity. With that approach they can see obvious problems that those enmeshed in the daily grind miss completely. This article is an excellent description of how mangers can put this concept to practical use on their own. I know from experience that the most successful teams I have managed succeeded mostly on their own, while I created the proper environment and gave them simple, clear goals (which were pretty general in most cases). This approach also applies to people, especially for teams with high levels...Read On

Author's Response:
6/25/2004    
Hi, John – Ah, you’ve revealed the consultants secret! :-) It’s true, it’s hard for someone who is in the soup to see the soup. It’s often easier for someone outside the situation to see the dynamics and the levers for change. That’s also part of what I do with retrospectives – help the team see their patterns and dynamics by creating a visual of what happened on a project. Then they see their own patterns and choose how to change. Thanks for the pointers to self-directed teams, and thanks for writing.

 
 
Comment:    
by Sanal Menon 6/23/2004

These are very practical thoughts you have put in. "Every once in a while I hear a manager assert that people work best when they’re a little afraid. I don’t buy that." --- A perfect statement and I totally agree with it. I have often heard people talking in these lines. As far as decision making goes, it is always a good practice to involve the team members to make their own decisions. Managers will need to have the eyes of a teacher where validity of the decisions are ensured. By this, I mean that let the team member make a decision on an issue, as long as he feels he is capable of taking such a decision. Before he implements this...Read On

Author's Response:
6/25/2004    
Hi, Sanal – I spoke with a guy (I’ll call him Pete) last fall who described how his boss mentored him on decisions. For a start they talked about what sort of decisions were his to make – the boundaries. Then, as part of 1:1 meetings, they reviewed the decisions Pete had made during the course of the week. They talked through the situations, risks, effects, and alternatives, which decisions worked out, and which weren’t so great. Pete felt he learned an enormous amount and had the freedom to learn from mistakes, but the safety net to make too big mistakes. Thanks for writing.

 
 
Comment:    
by Misty Schmidt 6/22/2004

What a great article! I’d been having trouble articulating exactly why I was unhappy at my last job and looking to get out. You nailed it on the head. All of the points mentioned under "Are You Creating an Environment for Success?" were missing. The whole situation left me feeling frustrated and unbelievably stressed out. In the end, I knew the only way to protect my sanity was to get out of there. The environment was like a poison. Every day that I went in to work it ate away at my psyche. When projects or even companies fall behind or fail, people need to analyze all the contributing factors, including the work environment itself. The...Read On

Author's Response:
6/25/2004    
Hi, Misty – It is frustrating to work in an environment that stacked up against you. I’ve found myself in that situation a time or two. My first strategy is to pull some sense of goals and priorities out of my manager. If that doesn’t work, I cone up with a list of priorities and let my manager know that’s how I’d be ordering my day. It helped some. Glad to hear you’ve found a more satisfying environment! Thanks for writing.

 
 
Comment:    
by Jon Hagar 6/22/2004

I find as a leader of the test group, part of my job is customizing the environment both for the group and for each person. Each person has unique elements and some days we forget this. I get much better results if a treat my people based on what they need to create the best environment for them. Example: Bill likes to come in late. John likes to come in early. We have our "stand up" SCRUM type of daily status meeting at 10 or 11 am instead of first thing (8 am). This involves some logistics, but it works for the team and keeps everyone "communicating".

Author's Response:
6/24/2004    
Hi, Jon - Good point. Each person is unique, and so managers need to have flexibility to interact with and support the different personalities on the team. Nice to hear from you.

 
 
Comment:    
by yogita sahoo 6/22/2004

If a manager succeeds in breaking the ice between him and his team members, I feel the battle is half won. It’s important that team members are comfortable in giving their feedback, crib about their work and give suggestions to their manager. I agree with you point of giving people a sense of respect. If a manager has the time, will and patience to listen to his people, his team automatically feels important, responsible and special. Nice article and good thoughts !!!

Author's Response:
6/23/2004    
Hello Yogita – I was talking to a guy the other day about one of the most effective managers he’d ever met. She made a point of knowing the people who reported to her…. Not just what they were working on, but their strengths, aspirations, and interests. She cared about their development, as well as their “production.” And she knew and cared about their lives outside work (without prying to an inappropriate level). Thanks for writing.

 
 
Comment:    
by Prabhaakar Balasubramanian 6/21/2004

Hey, everyone knows the equation, but use B = ƒ(P^10,E). Yes you have pointed out everything which possibly hinders perfomance. May be i would like to point out one thing,ie environment includes our fellow mates, and in many situations they discourage each other, and there is a lot of prejudice, jealousy and they don't want a 3 yr exp. guy performing more or equal to them(5-7yrs of exp). People are insecure when they confront with a good performing guy and they tend to avoid him and curtail growth. So the manager may not always be in a position to be aware of such things. what say?

Author's Response:
6/23/2004    
Hi, Prabhaakar – You make a good point, the team is part of the environment and can affect work performance. I think a manager can actually tell a lot about how people are working together on the team by observing, asking probing questions in 1:1 meetings, and so forth. When I see unhealthy competition, I look at the way goals are framed and how work is measured. If all the goals are individual, then sometimes there is little incentive for people to support and help each other. Software is hard enough without having team members working against each other… Thanks for writing.

 
Back to Top


Marketplace

RESOLVE SUPPORT ISSUES from your Desktop!
Minimize downtime with a remote support solution that lets you resolve issues right from the desktop

See how EASY REMOTE SUPPORT can be. Try WebEx FREE!
DELIVER SUPPORT MORE EFFICIENTLY. Remotely Control Applications. Leap Securely through Firewalls!

SOLVE SUPPORT ISSUES on the First Call!
REMOTELY CONTROL AND CONFIGURE SYSTEMS. Easily install applications, updates. All from your Desktop!

IMPROVE YOUR SUPPORT EFFICIENCY
WebEx lets you remotely control, configure and install applications and updates more efficiently.

Need Agile Test Cases?
Create statistically complete test cases simply and quickly.

Get your product or service listed here.
Subscribe to Better Software Magazine
Subscribe to Better Software Magazine

First Name:

Last Name:

Email Address:


Home   |   Resources   |   Topics   |   Community   |   PowerPass



© 2008 StickyMinds.com. All rights reserved.
StickyMinds.com is a division of Software Quality Engineering.
Privacy Policy    Terms & Conditions    Link to StickyMinds.com    Feedback


HP SOA

AccuRev



Better Software Conference & EXPO 2008